In that last post, my very first attempt at a blog, I posted the piece I wrote about Melville and Hawthorne for the British newspaper, the Telegraph. I've been thinking a lot about this relationship lately: it mattered that Hawthorne was living a few miles away from Melville, and was the reader of his shoulder. It was not for nothing that Melville dedicated the novel to Hawthorne.
I just finished writing an introduction to a new British edition of Moby-Dick, and this got me to reread the book for the umpteenth time. I'm always amazed by its strangeness, its bizarre grab-bag of ideas and narrative, meditation, and quotation. Melville was one of the first writers to see that a novel can digest a range of things. It's what James called a "loose baggy monster" for good reasons.
My own novel about Melville, which just came out in Britain, is pretty loose and baggy. I was trying to experiment in the even chapters with writing biographical narrative as fiction in the guise of nonfiction. I was "telling" more than "showing." This may or may not work, but it was interesting to play around with. I liked writing as Lizzie, Mrs. Melville, in the odd chapter. Very odd chapter, as Lizzie is a mixed up and wildly erratic person. What I was trying to do was show her gradual acceptance of her husband and his artistic dream.
A few critics have disliked my use of famous Melville quotations, such as "I prefer not to." That's such a famous line from "Bartleby," it was perhaps crazy to do what I did: make it domestic. But what I hoped to do was twofold: make a little joke, and show that even great moments in fiction have a mundane origin. I actually think it works.
Reviews are bizarre forms of writing: so arbitrary. There is very little need to argue a case or back up an opinion. These are what they are: brief takes, impressionistic, ephemeral.
I've had enough unsolicited responses from readers to know that some will like this book. I suppose that is what matters. Or I suppose what matters is that I believe in what I wrote, and will stand behind it. Time, as always, will tell whether there is anything worth keeping in this book, or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment